GitSniff vs Greptile

One model, one bet. Pick yours.

GitSniff lets you choose the reviewer, see the cost, and swap models per PR.

Head to head

The differences that matter.

Feature
GitSniff
Greptile
Pricing model
Per token reviewed
$30 per developer, per month
Per-review cost visibility
Exact tokens and dollars
Hidden behind seat fee
Model choice
100+ via OpenRouter
Single fixed model
Swap model per PR
Interactive chat
Auto-fix generation
Security scanners
Bearer, Semgrep, Trivy
Not bundled
10 inactive developers
$0
$300 per month
Why switch

Three reasons teams move to GitSniff.

01

You see every dollar.

Each review logs input tokens, output tokens, and cost. No seat fee hiding what you actually spend.

02

You choose the reviewer.

Claude for nuance, Gemini for scale, Grok for speed. Greptile picks one model and ships it for everyone.

03

Chat and auto-fix ship together.

Ask questions on the PR, accept generated patches. Greptile stops at the review comment.

What you get

The full picture.

Size-aware routing

Small PRs go to a fast model. Large PRs go to a powerful one. Automatic and auditable.

Frontier models on demand

Claude Opus for architecture calls, GPT-4 for breadth, Gemini for long context. Pick per repo or per PR.

Security by default

Scanners run every PR. No separate vendor, no extra integration work.

Custom repo instructions

Drop standards into .opencode/instructions.md and every review adopts them.

No seat minimums

Quiet month, quiet bill. Scale contributors without scaling spend.

Transparent dashboards

Review cost, model choice, and findings breakdown per repo, per week.

Get started

Stop guessing which model reviewed your PR.

GitSniff shows you the model, the tokens, and the reasoning. Install the GitHub app to try it on your next PR.