Review in GitHub, not in an IDE.
GitSniff lives on the pull request. BugBot routes you back to Cursor.
The differences that matter.
Three reasons teams move to GitSniff.
GitHub is the review surface.
Comments, suggestions, and fixes live on the PR. Engineers who use Vim, Zed, or VS Code work the same as Cursor users.
Real scanners, not AI guesses.
Bearer finds PII leaks. Semgrep catches injection patterns. Trivy flags vulnerable deps. BugBot asks an LLM instead.
Open source stays free.
External contributors to your OSS project never hit your bill. BugBot counts every PR author as a seat.
The full picture.
Editor-agnostic
Works with any editor, any OS. The review happens on GitHub, not in your tool of choice.
Any frontier model
Route to Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek — picked per repo or per PR, not bundled with an IDE license.
Usage billing
A quiet sprint costs almost nothing. A refactor week costs more. Scales with work, not payroll.
Inline auto-fix
Approve suggestions directly on the diff. No context switch to another surface.
Multi-stage filtering
Quality passes remove low-signal findings before they ever reach the PR.
Chat on the PR
Ask GitSniff why it flagged something. The answer stays threaded in GitHub.
Keep your editor. Replace the reviewer.
Install the GitHub app and your next PR gets reviewed without asking anyone to change tooling.